Granted, while GPC + published adventures give you a nice skeleton, if you want to focus more on the individual families and such, you still have to do some prep work. However, if they want to be in the spotlight more, one option with a group of six would be to split them into two groups of three and run two campaigns in parallel. For instance, if they like having a large party with limited time in the spotlight but sharing in all the adventures together, no problem with a larger group. One thing I would likely do in a situation such like the above is to check with the players as well. So I'm polling on thoughts/experience people have.
#King arthur pendragon rpg winter court event rolls plus
I'm asking because I was planning on getting a game going, but some folks have moved back and my gaming group has swelled to six players plus GM, and I think that is going to hinder the game.
And I do roll for important enemies and such. Naturally this works better when the Players have more experience with the system. Thus speeds up combat a lot when I don't have to do the opposed rolls one by one and can just ask each Player what the result was. Also, what is the reliability? If you are often missing a player due to scheduling conflicts or such, then in effect you have just five players present each time.Īs for combat: I strongly recommend having the Players handle their opponents rolls, too. But if all of them want plenty of screen time and personalized adventures and such, then six is going to be tough. If some of them are more passive and happy with it being so, then six might work. So it also depends what kinds of players you have. The problem is that with more players each of them gets less screen time. I used to have six players and it was a bit of a chore. With three, there is more of a risk of 'third-wheel' when it comes to intra-PK interaction.
0 kommentar(er)
